Contact Us


Whether you represent a corporate, a consultancy, a government or an MSSP, we’d love to hear from you. To discover just how our offensive security contractors could help, get in touch.

+44 (0)208 102 0765

Atlan Digital Limited
86-90 Paul Street

Understanding Language Model Hallucinations: A Deep Dive



Language models (LMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 are powerful tools in artificial intelligence, capable of generating human-like text based on vast datasets. However, a significant challenge with these models is their tendency to hallucinate, meaning they sometimes generate incorrect or misleading information. This blog post explores the phenomenon of hallucinations in LMs, focusing on how they can "snowball," leading to a cascade of errors.

What Are Hallucinations in Language Models?

Hallucinations in the context of LMs refer to instances where the model produces statements or answers that are factually incorrect or fabricated. These errors often sound plausible and can be mistaken for true information by users. Hallucinations are typically attributed to gaps in the model's knowledge base or its inability to access relevant information during the generation process.

Snowballing Hallucinations

The concept of snowballing hallucinations is introduced to describe how initial errors in an LM's output can lead to a series of subsequent errors. This occurs when an LM, after generating an incorrect answer, justifies this answer with further incorrect claims, which it might independently recognize as false if evaluated separately.

For example, if GPT-4 incorrectly states that a number is not prime, it may justify this by providing a false factorization. When asked separately, GPT-4 might correctly identify that the provided factors are incorrect, revealing a disconnect between the initial error and the model's underlying knowledge.

Empirical Studies and Datasets

Researchers constructed three datasets to study snowballing hallucinations:

  1. Primality Testing: Questions about whether a number is prime, where the model often provides incorrect factorization for non-prime numbers.
  2. Senator Search: Questions about historical U.S. senators with specific attributes, where the model might falsely claim the existence of a senator fitting the criteria.
  3. Graph Connectivity: Questions about flight connections between cities, where the model might incorrectly describe flight paths.

Key Findings

  1. High Initial Committal: LMs tend to commit to an answer early in the response (e.g., Yes or No), which sets the stage for potential hallucinations if the initial answer is incorrect.
  2. Recognition of Errors: When prompted to verify specific claims separately, LMs like GPT-4 can often recognize their initial mistakes. For instance, GPT-4 could identify 87% of its own incorrect claims when asked separately.
  3. Sequential Reasoning Limitations: Transformers, the underlying architecture of LMs, have limitations in solving sequential reasoning problems within a single step, contributing to the snowball effect.

To reduce the occurrence of snowballing hallucinations, researchers suggest encouraging LMs to reason through problems step-by-step before committing to an answer. Although this approach improves accuracy, it doesn't entirely eliminate the issue. Continuous refinement in LM training and prompting strategies is necessary to further mitigate hallucinations.

Understanding and addressing hallucinations in language models is crucial for their safe and effective use in practical applications. By studying how these errors propagate and exploring ways to mitigate them, researchers aim to enhance the reliability of LMs, ensuring they provide more accurate and trustworthy information.

Security Implications of Snowballing Hallucinations

The snowballing effect of hallucinations in language models poses significant security risks. For example, if a language model generates incorrect information in a cybersecurity context, it might mislead users into taking inappropriate actions based on false premises. This could include mishandling security protocols, misidentifying threats, or misconfiguring systems, potentially leading to vulnerabilities and exploitation by malicious actors. Therefore, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of language models is critical to maintaining robust cybersecurity defenses and preventing cascading errors that could compromise security.

Contact Us

How can we help?

Whether you represent a corporate, a consultancy, a government or an MSSP, we’dlove to hear from you. To discover just how our offensive security contractors could help, get in touch.